DOE, Energy Exports, Energy Policy, Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG), U.S. Senate

Our Move Towards Energy Exportation: The U.S. Senate Explores Natural Gas Exports Following the DOE’s Approval for a Second Facility to Export Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) to Non-FTA Countries

            On May 21, 2013, the U.S. Senate Committee on Energy & Natural Resources held the Full Committee Forum: Domestic Supply and Exports to discuss the U.S. supply and export of natural gas.  The Senate Committee’s natural gas roundtable followed the U.S. Department of Energy’s May 17th approval of the second facility to export liquefied natural gas (“LNG”) to countries that do not have a Free Trade Agreement (“FTA”) with the U.S. (“non-FTA countries”).  This is only the second of more than twenty such pending applications to be approved by the DOE.  The first application was approved two years ago.  You can read our previous post for more about the DOE’s LNG export approval.  The energy industry predicts a spike in global LNG demand over available supply in the foreseeable future, and this area of the industry is likely awaiting the most policy development.  During the May 21st Senate Committee on Energy & Natural Resources natural gas roundtable, discussions highlighted the tensions presented by the possibility of the U.S. entering the LNG export market, as well as the urgency to do so if the U.S. is going to compete.

            The opening statement by Chairman Wyden noted that the potential exporting of U.S. energy resources is “a subject of great interest in our country,” but it is one with conflicting views regarding whether it is in the best interests of the country:

Some will assert that this is unquestionably a good thing, that the energy trade could reduce our trade deficits, improve relationships with our allies and provide a further boost to a recovering economy. Others are going to assert that unfettered exports, with little to no consideration of broader economic and regional concerns, could lead to the United States “exporting its advantage.”

My own view is that our country should not be wedded to this either/or choice between no exports and no limits on exports. Done right, there ought to be a way to get the trade benefits to exporters and our trading partners while maintaining the domestic economic and energy security benefits to our country.

The shale boom has come at an extremely fortuitous time for America. It is providing many of our manufacturers an opportunity to re-import jobs that had moved away. This is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for our nation’s economy at a time when millions of our people are hurting economically. It is also producing a growing, thriving domestic oil and gas industry, creating jobs across the country and reducing our nation’s dependence on imported energy. In short, we are now in a position of strength.

           Ranking Member Murkowski followed with insight into the exigencies that must be considered if the U.S. will move into the LNG export market:

I’m pleased the Department of Energy is moving forward under its existing authorities to approve LNG export license applications. It’s my hope that last week’s decision on Freeport is the first of many projects that will be approved in the coming weeks and months – not years. The decision clearly shows that the Department’s review process is deliberative, impartial and thorough – though greater certainty should be provided so we can press our advantage in world markets.

The vast majority of independent analyses conducted over the past year have found that exports overwhelmingly benefit the economy. And, ultimately, market forces will serve to limit the number of export facilities that actually get built. We simply cannot afford to needlessly drag our feet on exports, or we’re going to let real economic development opportunities, and the chance to provide our allies access to an abundant, affordable and clean source of energy, slip through our fingers.

The forum also was attended by several government and industry witnesses who provided their perspectives on these issues.  You can see the full webcast of the roundtable here.

            With the current opportunity to capture a percentage of the global LNG market, we may see pressure for the DOE and legislators to act more expeditiously with respect to LNG export approval and policy.  There are approximately twenty additional applications pending the DOE’s approval to export LNG to non-FTA countries.  You can see a summary of all LNG export applications submitted to the DOE here.

Brian Heslin

About Brian Heslin

Brian Heslin represents energy companies in regulatory proceedings at the state and federal level. In addition, he provides advice on busines and strategic planning, upstream natural gas supply and capacity negotiation, compliance and other related services.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.

Welcome to the Energy Interdependency Blog!

The landscape of the energy industry is rapidly changing, with a focus on the development of clean, domestic energy sources and a secure, reliable energy infrastructure driving significant changes in the interdependency of energy industry segments and an increase in government regulation. Continued growth in the domestic production of oil and natural gas has positioned the U.S. to be an energy exporter in the global market and will have a marked impact on the course of the industry’s development.

The Moore & Van Allen Energy Interdependency Blog seeks to inform companies navigating the domestic and global energy markets by providing leading-edge insight on issues critical to energy interdependency and developments in energy policy, regulation, and related litigation.

Connect to Recent Authors

  • Brian Heslin:  View Brian Heslin's Bio View Brian Heslin's LinkedIn profileFollow @BrianHeslin on Twitter
  • Mindy Vervais:  View Mindy Vervais’ Bio View Mindy Vervais’ LinkedIn profile

  • Subscribe to Blog Via Email

    Follow MVA

    Facebooktwitterlinkedinrss

    Blog Topics

    Archives


    Our Energy Practice

    Headquartered in the burgeoning energy hub of Charlotte, NC, Moore & Van Allen has an extensive energy practice that is national and international in scope. Our energy team is composed of highly-skilled attorneys from a cross-section of legal disciplines with a thorough understanding of the complex technologies, transactions, and regulations inherent to the energy industry and its various segments, including natural gas & LNG, electricity, oil, water & sewer, telecommunications, and alternative energy & green technology.

    We leverage our significant experience to guide our clients successfully through the intricacies of their businesses, from marketing, compliance counseling, and project development, to project finance, federal and state regulation, investigations and litigation. We proudly and successfully serve companies throughout the nation, including the largest natural gas and electric companies in the Carolinas. Read More About Our Practice and Meet the MVA Energy Team.

    Disclaimer

    No Attorney-Client Relationship Created by Use of this Website: Neither your receipt of information from this website, nor your use of this website to contact Moore & Van Allen or one of its attorneys creates an attorney-client relationship between you and Moore & Van Allen. As a matter of policy, Moore & Van Allen does not accept a new client without first investigating for possible conflicts of interests and obtaining a signed engagement letter. (Moore & Van Allen may, for example, already represent another party involved in your matter.) Accordingly, you should not use this website to provide confidential information about a legal matter of yours to Moore & Van Allen.


    No Legal Advice Intended: This website includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances. You should contact an attorney for advice on specific legal problems. (Read All)