CFTC, Dodd-Frank, Energy Policy, Energy Trading, FERC, Government Investigations, U.S. Senate

Will Congressional Pressure on the CFTC to Share Information With FERC Bear Fruit?

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) has identified ferreting out energy market manipulation as a priority in its enforcement efforts.  On January 2, 2014, FERC and the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) signed two Memoranda of Understanding (“MOUs”) that address the agencies’ jurisdictional overlap and sharing of information related to the agencies’ market surveillance and investigations, as required by the Dodd-Frank Act. (See our previous post).  So now what?  Prior to signing the MOUs, the CFTC and FERC had failed to coordinate on energy market enforcement activities, and the CFTC’s unwillingness to cooperate was identified as the primary obstacle by Senator Ron Wyden, former Chairman of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, and others.  Read our earlier post Barriers to Cooperation between the CFTC and FERC Hinder Investigations into Energy Market Manipulation – A Legislative Fix May be on the Horizon  for details.  As of mid-January, when the CFTC testified before the Senate Banking Committee, the CFTC had not begun sharing requested information with FERC, including trading data from the CFTC’s Large Trader Report, because: “there are questions just around data transfer issues and the technical personnel need to work those things out.”   Eight U.S. Senators, including Senator Wyden, made a request to the CFTC in a February 7, 2014 letter:  get it done by the end of February.

In the February 7th letter to then Acting CFTC Chairman Mark Wetjen, the Senators proclaimed that “[i]nformation sharing between CFTC and FERC has been delayed for too long, putting our energy markets at risk of abuse unnecessarily.”  Pointing to the $45 billion it cost Americans during the Western energy crisis, the Senators urged that the lack of information sharing leads to a lack of real-time market oversight that allows “traders to rob Americans, disrupt economic activity and darken cities.”  They requested that the CFTC “address technical issues and initiate information sharing no later than the end of February.”  The Senators stressed that the CFTC should be able to address technical obstacles preventing it from sharing the Large Trader Report with FERC within weeks, given that the agency already has the technical capabilities to share data with other countries and regulators.  To the extent that the CFTC needed to upgrade its technology, the Senators asked that the CFTC “lay out those investments in detail in its spending plan for Fiscal Year 2014 funding, which [was] due to Congress by February 17.”  Interestingly, CFTC Commissioner Scott D. O’Malia dissented from the spending plan submitted by the CFTC in a February 27, 2014 statement based, in part, on the fact that “it does not allocate enough funding to new and enhanced technology investments that are essential to the efficient surveillance and oversight of the futures and swaps markets.”  What impact this, and the Sentator’s prompting, will have on the CFTC’s information sharing with FERC remains to be seen.

Brian Heslin

About Brian Heslin

Brian Heslin represents energy companies in regulatory proceedings at the state and federal level. In addition, he provides advice on busines and strategic planning, upstream natural gas supply and capacity negotiation, compliance and other related services.


No comments yet.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Welcome to the Energy Interdependency Blog!

The landscape of the energy industry is rapidly changing, with a focus on the development of clean, domestic energy sources and a secure, reliable energy infrastructure driving significant changes in the interdependency of energy industry segments and an increase in government regulation. Continued growth in the domestic production of oil and natural gas has positioned the U.S. to be an energy exporter in the global market and will have a marked impact on the course of the industry’s development.

The Moore & Van Allen Energy Interdependency Blog seeks to inform companies navigating the domestic and global energy markets by providing leading-edge insight on issues critical to energy interdependency and developments in energy policy, regulation, and related litigation.

Connect to Recent Authors

  • Brian Heslin:  View Brian Heslin's Bio View Brian Heslin's LinkedIn profileFollow @BrianHeslin on Twitter
  • Mindy Vervais:  View Mindy Vervais’ Bio View Mindy Vervais’ LinkedIn profile

  • Subscribe to Blog Via Email

    Follow MVA


    Blog Topics


    Our Energy Practice

    Headquartered in the burgeoning energy hub of Charlotte, NC, Moore & Van Allen has an extensive energy practice that is national and international in scope. Our energy team is composed of highly-skilled attorneys from a cross-section of legal disciplines with a thorough understanding of the complex technologies, transactions, and regulations inherent to the energy industry and its various segments, including natural gas & LNG, electricity, oil, water & sewer, telecommunications, and alternative energy & green technology.

    We leverage our significant experience to guide our clients successfully through the intricacies of their businesses, from marketing, compliance counseling, and project development, to project finance, federal and state regulation, investigations and litigation. We proudly and successfully serve companies throughout the nation, including the largest natural gas and electric companies in the Carolinas. Read More About Our Practice and Meet the MVA Energy Team.


    No Attorney-Client Relationship Created by Use of this Website: Neither your receipt of information from this website, nor your use of this website to contact Moore & Van Allen or one of its attorneys creates an attorney-client relationship between you and Moore & Van Allen. As a matter of policy, Moore & Van Allen does not accept a new client without first investigating for possible conflicts of interests and obtaining a signed engagement letter. (Moore & Van Allen may, for example, already represent another party involved in your matter.) Accordingly, you should not use this website to provide confidential information about a legal matter of yours to Moore & Van Allen.

    No Legal Advice Intended: This website includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances. You should contact an attorney for advice on specific legal problems. (Read All)