Energy Trading, FERC, Government Investigations

The Energy Markets Under a Microscope: Government Investigations into Market Manipulation

            The paths of the energy industry and probing government investigations are crossing more and more often, as regulators and legislators have made it a priority to ensure the integrity of energy markets.  The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”), Office of Enforcement has made fraud and market manipulation one of its top four priorities, prompting the creation in 2012 of the Division of Analytics and Surveillance (“DAS”), which facilitates the identification of investigative targets through continuous surveillance and analysis of “the natural gas and electricity markets and related financial products … to detect potential manipulation, anticompetitive behavior, and other anomalous activity.”  In the last year and a half alone, FERC pursued investigations into manipulation of the energy markets, seeking to impose in excess of $500 million in civil penalties on the companies under investigation, plus the disgorgement of more than $150 million in profits.  In the course of these investigations, FERC also initiated proceedings against individuals, seeking millions of dollars in fines for their involvement in the alleged market manipulation.  The spotlight on the investigation of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (“JPMorgan”), and its subsidiary, J.P. Morgan Ventures Energy Corp. (“JPMVEC”), for allegedly using manipulative trading strategies in the electricity markets in California and Michigan brings to the forefront the tenacity of FERC’s enforcement efforts.

            JPMorgan’s May, 2013 10Q Filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission acknowledged the current posture of FERC’s investigation into the company and individual employees: “In March 2013, the Firm received a Wells-type notice that the FERC staff intends to recommend that the Commission bring a possible enforcement action against [JPMVEC], [JPMorgan] and certain Firm personnel relating to alleged violations of FERC rules and the rules of certain independent system operators.”  This March 2013 notice followed FERC’s November 2012 suspension of JPMVEC’s electric market-based rate authority for allegedly submitting false information to the Commission in connection with the ongoing investigation. The suspension prohibits JPMVEC from selling power at market-based rates for six months effective April 1, 2013.  During the course of the JPMorgan investigation, FERC also sought court intervention to resolve disputes regarding JPMorgan’s invocation of the attorney-client privilege with respect to certain emails.  A recent New York Times article discusses FERC’s findings in the March 2013 “Wells-type notice” that JPMorgan received.  The article explains that FERC’s investigators claim that traders harmed the markets by using several schemes to offer electricity at prices that were “calculated to falsely appear attractive to state energy authorities,” who then made approximately $83 million in “excessive” payments to JPMorgan.  JPMorgan denies any wrongdoing.

            In other recent efforts to curtail market manipulation, FERC reached a settlement with Constellations Energy Commodities Group, LLC in which the company neither admitted nor denied the allegations, but agreed to pay a record amount of $135 million in civil penalties and $110 million in disgorgement.  FERC also settled a proceeding with Deutsche Bank Energy Trading LLC regarding manipulation of the California power markets, in which the company agreed to pay a $1.5 million civil penalty and disgorge $172,645 of profits without admitting or denying the allegations.  And in an aggressive proceeding against Barclays Bank PLC and several individual traders for allegedly manipulating electricity markets in and around California, FERC issued a show cause order seeking a $435 million penalty and $34.9 million in disgorged profits from the company, as well as $18 million in penalties from the individual traders.  These are just a few of the many efforts undertaken by the FERC Office of Enforcement in which the energy industry has come face-to-face with the burdens brought on by government probes, including the need to balance tough considerations like whether to cooperate with the government, when to invoke or waive attorney-client privilege, and issues raised by the government’s targeting of individual employees.

            In the current environment, we likely will continue to see aggressive regulatory enforcement efforts focused on the energy markets.  The worlds of energy industry regulation and energy trading will continue to collide with the intricacies of government investigations.

Brian Heslin

About Brian Heslin

Brian Heslin represents energy companies in regulatory proceedings at the state and federal level. In addition, he provides advice on busines and strategic planning, upstream natural gas supply and capacity negotiation, compliance and other related services.


3 thoughts on “The Energy Markets Under a Microscope: Government Investigations into Market Manipulation

  1. I’ve been looking for information like this for quite a while and found your blog post. Thanks so much for the information.!!!!!
    Equity tips

    Posted by Equityresearchlab | May 30, 2015, 3:11 am


  1. Pingback: Energy Interdependency Blog - FERC Investigations into Energy Market Manipulation Make an Impression With Record Penalties Imposed on Companies and Individuals - August 9, 2013

  2. Pingback: The Investigative and Enforcement Priorities of the FERC Office of EnforcementEnergy Interdependency Blog | Energy Interdependency Blog - January 8, 2014

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Welcome to the Energy Interdependency Blog!

The landscape of the energy industry is rapidly changing, with a focus on the development of clean, domestic energy sources and a secure, reliable energy infrastructure driving significant changes in the interdependency of energy industry segments and an increase in government regulation. Continued growth in the domestic production of oil and natural gas has positioned the U.S. to be an energy exporter in the global market and will have a marked impact on the course of the industry’s development.

The Moore & Van Allen Energy Interdependency Blog seeks to inform companies navigating the domestic and global energy markets by providing leading-edge insight on issues critical to energy interdependency and developments in energy policy, regulation, and related litigation.

Connect to Recent Authors

  • Brian Heslin:  View Brian Heslin's Bio View Brian Heslin's LinkedIn profileFollow @BrianHeslin on Twitter
  • Mindy Vervais:  View Mindy Vervais’ Bio View Mindy Vervais’ LinkedIn profile

  • Subscribe to Blog Via Email

    Follow MVA


    Blog Topics


    Our Energy Practice

    Headquartered in the burgeoning energy hub of Charlotte, NC, Moore & Van Allen has an extensive energy practice that is national and international in scope. Our energy team is composed of highly-skilled attorneys from a cross-section of legal disciplines with a thorough understanding of the complex technologies, transactions, and regulations inherent to the energy industry and its various segments, including natural gas & LNG, electricity, oil, water & sewer, telecommunications, and alternative energy & green technology.

    We leverage our significant experience to guide our clients successfully through the intricacies of their businesses, from marketing, compliance counseling, and project development, to project finance, federal and state regulation, investigations and litigation. We proudly and successfully serve companies throughout the nation, including the largest natural gas and electric companies in the Carolinas. Read More About Our Practice and Meet the MVA Energy Team.


    No Attorney-Client Relationship Created by Use of this Website: Neither your receipt of information from this website, nor your use of this website to contact Moore & Van Allen or one of its attorneys creates an attorney-client relationship between you and Moore & Van Allen. As a matter of policy, Moore & Van Allen does not accept a new client without first investigating for possible conflicts of interests and obtaining a signed engagement letter. (Moore & Van Allen may, for example, already represent another party involved in your matter.) Accordingly, you should not use this website to provide confidential information about a legal matter of yours to Moore & Van Allen.

    No Legal Advice Intended: This website includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances. You should contact an attorney for advice on specific legal problems. (Read All)