DOE, Energy Exports, Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG), Natural Gas, U.S. Senate

The DOE Continues to Approve the Expansion of U.S. Exports of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) to Non-FTA Countries

            This year we have seen the U.S. Department of Energy (“DOE”) move relatively quickly to approve applications for authorization to export liquefied natural gas (“LNG”) to countries that do not have a free trade agreement with the U.S. (“non-FTA countries”).  The first DOE authorization for LNG export to non-FTA countries was granted in May 2011 to the Sabine Pass LNG Terminal in Cameron Parish, Louisiana.  It was not until May 2013 that the DOE granted authorization for additional U.S. exports of LNG to non-FTA countries, giving Freeport LNG Expansion, L.P. and FLNG Liquefaction, LLC (“Freeport”) conditional approval to export up to 1.4 billion cubic feet (Bcf/d) of LNG per day from its terminal on Quintana Island, Texas for a period of 20 years.  You can read our previous post for information regarding the May 2013 Freeport authorization and background on the approval process.  On November 15, 2013, the DOE approved the expansion of Freeport’s LNG export volume, issuing Order No. 3357 authorizing up to an additional 0.4 Bcf/d of LNG to be exported from Freeport’s Quintana Island, Texas terminal.  Keeping in stride with the DOE’s new pace for processing pending applications, this Freeport expansion authorization comes just two months after the last DOE approval and is the fourth LNG export application that the agency has approved since May 2013.  The DOE’s Announcement explains that Freeport’s application to expand its LNG export volume was “next in the order of precedence” after the September 2013 approval of the Dominion Cove Point facility application. A DOE Summary of LNG Applications reflects that twenty-one additional applications are currently under review, as of November 15, 2013.

            The DOE’s continued expansion of authorized LNG export volume continues to raise dueling concerns regarding the potential impact of increased exports on natural gas prices and American businesses and families, on the one hand, and the danger that the U.S. will miss the opportunity to be a major player in the global energy market if the government does not move more quickly to authorize additional energy exports.  U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee Chairman Ron Wyden expressed concern during a November 14th hearing with Chris Smith, the nominee for assistant secretary of Energy for the DOE’s Office of Fossil Energy, that the DOE must take into account “updated data that includes regional factors and domestic costs” in determining whether to approve additional applications for LNG exports.  Chairman Wyden questioned whether the DOE would, and should, slow down its efforts to authorize additional exports, stating:

I think there’s an opportunity here for us to find the sweet spot, where we can give a big lift to American industries where we have a pricing advantage, help our consumers, help renewables and be able to export.  Number one, we’re going to have to have good data, good and current data, and second, on matters like whether or not there’s going to be a pause and under what circumstance, we’re going to need some more clarity on that.

You can read more on Chairman Wyden’s hearing comments and access video of his discussion with Chris Smith.

            In response to the November 15th Freeport expansion authorization, Chairman Wyden cautioned against moving too quickly to approve additional LNG exports: “DOE has now conditionally approved liquefied natural gas exports that are far above what was considered possible just a few years ago. The agency must clearly demonstrate with each approval that it is using the most recent data about U.S. natural gas demand and production. It is imperative these potential exports not have a significant impact on domestic prices for families and manufacturers, and in turn harm America’s energy security, growth and employment.”  See Chairman Wyden’s Statement.  By contrast, Senator Lisa Murkowski, Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, continued to stress the need for the DOE to move more expeditiously to process pending LNG export applications:

I hope today’s approval represents a willingness by DOE to continue to process export applications in a timely fashion. Our nation has an historic opportunity to join a developing global gas trade, but we face a narrowing window. There are LNG export projects under construction around the world that are competing for market share with American gas supplies. The administration cannot drag its feet on export decisions or we may miss this opportunity for America’s natural gas to play a major role in the growing global market.

Senator Murkowski pointed out that Freeport’s first LNG authorization in May 2013 was based on an application filed in December 2010, and the Freeport expansion application that was approved on November 15th was filed in December 2011.  See Senator Murkowski’s Statement.

            The DOE announced that it will continue to process pending applications “on a case-by-case basis, in the order of precedence previously detailed,” and will “monitor any market developments and assess their impact in subsequent public interest determinations as further information becomes available, including the EIA’s Annual Energy Outlook Report at the end of 2013.”  For additional information regarding U.S. LNG exports, see our LNG post archives.

Brian Heslin

About Brian Heslin

Brian Heslin represents energy companies in regulatory proceedings at the state and federal level. In addition, he provides advice on busines and strategic planning, upstream natural gas supply and capacity negotiation, compliance and other related services.


No comments yet.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Welcome to the Energy Interdependency Blog!

The landscape of the energy industry is rapidly changing, with a focus on the development of clean, domestic energy sources and a secure, reliable energy infrastructure driving significant changes in the interdependency of energy industry segments and an increase in government regulation. Continued growth in the domestic production of oil and natural gas has positioned the U.S. to be an energy exporter in the global market and will have a marked impact on the course of the industry’s development.

The Moore & Van Allen Energy Interdependency Blog seeks to inform companies navigating the domestic and global energy markets by providing leading-edge insight on issues critical to energy interdependency and developments in energy policy, regulation, and related litigation.

Connect to Recent Authors

  • Brian Heslin:  View Brian Heslin's Bio View Brian Heslin's LinkedIn profileFollow @BrianHeslin on Twitter
  • Mindy Vervais:  View Mindy Vervais’ Bio View Mindy Vervais’ LinkedIn profile

  • Subscribe to Blog Via Email

    Follow MVA


    Blog Topics


    Our Energy Practice

    Headquartered in the burgeoning energy hub of Charlotte, NC, Moore & Van Allen has an extensive energy practice that is national and international in scope. Our energy team is composed of highly-skilled attorneys from a cross-section of legal disciplines with a thorough understanding of the complex technologies, transactions, and regulations inherent to the energy industry and its various segments, including natural gas & LNG, electricity, oil, water & sewer, telecommunications, and alternative energy & green technology.

    We leverage our significant experience to guide our clients successfully through the intricacies of their businesses, from marketing, compliance counseling, and project development, to project finance, federal and state regulation, investigations and litigation. We proudly and successfully serve companies throughout the nation, including the largest natural gas and electric companies in the Carolinas. Read More About Our Practice and Meet the MVA Energy Team.


    No Attorney-Client Relationship Created by Use of this Website: Neither your receipt of information from this website, nor your use of this website to contact Moore & Van Allen or one of its attorneys creates an attorney-client relationship between you and Moore & Van Allen. As a matter of policy, Moore & Van Allen does not accept a new client without first investigating for possible conflicts of interests and obtaining a signed engagement letter. (Moore & Van Allen may, for example, already represent another party involved in your matter.) Accordingly, you should not use this website to provide confidential information about a legal matter of yours to Moore & Van Allen.

    No Legal Advice Intended: This website includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances. You should contact an attorney for advice on specific legal problems. (Read All)