Coal, Electricity, Energy Litigation, Energy Policy, EPA, White House

Legal Challenge to EPA’s Proposed Clean Power Plan Rejected as Premature, Final Rule Sent to OMB for Review

Green trees reflecten on business building, enviromental care symbol.The proposed Clean Power Plan introduced by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in June 2014 has been met with considerable opposition, including a court battle that pitted energy companies and more than twenty States against each other in an effort to prevent the agency from implementing a final rule mandating the reduction of CO2 emissions from existing power plants.  On June 9, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals issued its opinion in In re: Murray Energy Corp., No. 14-1112 (consolidated with other cases) denying the petitions for review and a writ of prohibition on the basic principle that the court does not have authority to review a proposed agency rule.  Petitioner Murray Energy, joined by a dozen states, argued that the EPA does not have authority under the Clean Air Act to limit carbon dioxide emissions from existing power plants and sought court action to prevent the EPA from issuing the final rule.  Although all three Circuit Court Judges agreed to deny the petitions, Judge Henderson disagreed with the majority view that the court was powerless to act.  Judge Henderson opined that the All Writs Act provides the court with the necessary authority to act and issue a writ of prohibition.  Nonetheless, she concurred in the judgment on the finding that it would be inappropriate, particularly in light of the expectation that the EPA would issue the final rule shortly after the court’s opinion in the matter was issued.  In the court’s view, the unfortunate reality that companies incur costs associated with compliance while wading through the rulemaking process is a collateral consequence that will not justify early review of a proposed rule.

The EPA has reported that the final Clean Power Plan rule was sent to the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review on June 1, 2015.  The agency’s projection is that the final rule will be published in August.  Those with standing will be able to challenge the legality of the final rule at that point, and we can expect to see continued, significant opposition to the Plan.

Brian Heslin

About Brian Heslin

Brian Heslin represents energy companies in regulatory proceedings at the state and federal level. In addition, he provides advice on busines and strategic planning, upstream natural gas supply and capacity negotiation, compliance and other related services.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Welcome to the Energy Interdependency Blog!

The landscape of the energy industry is rapidly changing, with a focus on the development of clean, domestic energy sources and a secure, reliable energy infrastructure driving significant changes in the interdependency of energy industry segments and an increase in government regulation. Continued growth in the domestic production of oil and natural gas has positioned the U.S. to be an energy exporter in the global market and will have a marked impact on the course of the industry’s development.

The Moore & Van Allen Energy Interdependency Blog seeks to inform companies navigating the domestic and global energy markets by providing leading-edge insight on issues critical to energy interdependency and developments in energy policy, regulation, and related litigation.

Connect to Recent Authors

  • Brian Heslin:  View Brian Heslin's Bio View Brian Heslin's LinkedIn profileFollow @BrianHeslin on Twitter
  • Mindy Vervais:  View Mindy Vervais’ Bio View Mindy Vervais’ LinkedIn profile

  • Subscribe to Blog Via Email

    Follow MVA

    facebooktwitterlinkedinrss

    Blog Topics

    Archives


    Our Energy Practice

    Headquartered in the burgeoning energy hub of Charlotte, NC, Moore & Van Allen has an extensive energy practice that is national and international in scope. Our energy team is composed of highly-skilled attorneys from a cross-section of legal disciplines with a thorough understanding of the complex technologies, transactions, and regulations inherent to the energy industry and its various segments, including natural gas & LNG, electricity, oil, water & sewer, telecommunications, and alternative energy & green technology.

    We leverage our significant experience to guide our clients successfully through the intricacies of their businesses, from marketing, compliance counseling, and project development, to project finance, federal and state regulation, investigations and litigation. We proudly and successfully serve companies throughout the nation, including the largest natural gas and electric companies in the Carolinas. Read More About Our Practice and Meet the MVA Energy Team.

    Disclaimer

    No Attorney-Client Relationship Created by Use of this Website: Neither your receipt of information from this website, nor your use of this website to contact Moore & Van Allen or one of its attorneys creates an attorney-client relationship between you and Moore & Van Allen. As a matter of policy, Moore & Van Allen does not accept a new client without first investigating for possible conflicts of interests and obtaining a signed engagement letter. (Moore & Van Allen may, for example, already represent another party involved in your matter.) Accordingly, you should not use this website to provide confidential information about a legal matter of yours to Moore & Van Allen.


    No Legal Advice Intended: This website includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances. You should contact an attorney for advice on specific legal problems. (Read All)