DOE, Electricity, Energy Policy, Grid Security, Legislative Updates, U.S. House, U.S. Senate

Energy Industry Target of Cyber-Attacks and Congressional Efforts to Bolster Security

US Gov building 000004688650Medium[1]Cybersecurity of the electric power grid and energy sector as a whole has been the subject of heightened Congressional attention given the integral role the industry plays in our economy. According to a 2015 U.S. Senate committee report, nearly one-third of reported cyber-attacks involve the energy sector. Not surprisingly, the 114th Congress (2015-2016) has introduced several pieces of legislation targeted towards enhancing the security of the nation’s energy infrastructure. Among the bills introduced were S. 1068 – An act to amend the Federal Power Act to protect the bulk-power system from cyber security threats; S. 1241 – The Enhanced Grid Security Act of 2015; and two comprehensive energy bills that include provisions seeking to bolster energy sector cybersecurity and privacy, S. 2012 – The Energy Policy Modernization Act of 2015 and H.R. 8 – The North American Energy Security and Infrastructure Act of 2015. The comprehensive bills have gained traction in Congress, with H.R. 8 – The North American Energy Security and Infrastructure Act having passed out of the full House in December 2015 and S. 2012 – The Energy Policy Modernization Act of 2015 currently under consideration by the full Senate. The House bill was sent to the Senate for consideration and referred to the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee in December. The full Senate’s consideration of S.2012, along with several proposed amendments, began in late January 2016 and has been on hold since early February pending resolution of several issues, including how the Senate will deal with proposed amendments to the bill related to funding for the Flint, MI water crisis and offshore drilling revenues.

While cybersecurity is not the sole focus of the two comprehensive energy bills, both emphasize the critical importance of shoring up the nation’s energy infrastructure and technical capabilities to protect against cyber threats. H.R. 8 – The North American Energy Security and Infrastructure Act declares it as the policy of the United States to promote and advance safeguarding the nation’s critical energy delivery infrastructure and enhancing the infrastructure’s resilience to cyber threats, as well as the development of cyber-secure advanced grid technologies to increase cybersecurity awareness and protection. With respect to cybersecurity, the Senate Committee views its proposal as picking up where federal legislation left off in the Energy Policy Act of 2005, which granted the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) primary responsibility for securing the power grid and established an Electric Reliability Organization tasked with developing mandatory reliability standards for the industry. The Energy Policy Modernization Act of 2015 is the product of an extensive effort by the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee during which ten oversight and legislative hearings were conducted to consider 114 bills last year. The Act is credited as the most comprehensive energy legislative effort in the Senate in nearly a decade and incorporates nearly 50 of the bills considered, including S. 1068 and S. 1241. We highlight key cybersecurity and privacy provisions from these bills below.

Energy Bills 13

As the U.S. emerges as a global leader in energy, it is critical that it also emerges as a leader in cybersecurity in order to safeguard the nation’s energy resources and infrastructure. We will keep you posted regarding the fate of H.R. 8 and S. 2012, as well as further energy cybersecurity-related legislative developments.

 

Mindy Vervais

About Mindy Vervais

Mindy Vervais' practice focuses on energy regulation and general commercial litigation. A significant portion of Mindy’s practice involves providing regulatory, business and litigation services to regulated infrastructure service industries including electric, natural gas, water and sewer utilities, hydroelectric facilities, and telecommunication companies. Mindy is regularly involved in administrative litigation at the state and federal level as well as in providing general business advice, compliance planning, and a wide variety of related legal services. She has represented clients before multiple state public service commissions as well as the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Mindy’s commercial litigation experience includes representing clients in state and federal courts throughout North Carolina as well as in a number of other jurisdictions in matters concerning a wide variety of issues including contract and employment disputes, trade secrets, commercial real estate, equipment leasing, and collection matters. Most recently, Mindy obtained a jury verdict in favor of a national home warranty company in a wrongful death suit.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Welcome to the Energy Interdependency Blog!

The landscape of the energy industry is rapidly changing, with a focus on the development of clean, domestic energy sources and a secure, reliable energy infrastructure driving significant changes in the interdependency of energy industry segments and an increase in government regulation. Continued growth in the domestic production of oil and natural gas has positioned the U.S. to be an energy exporter in the global market and will have a marked impact on the course of the industry’s development.

The Moore & Van Allen Energy Interdependency Blog seeks to inform companies navigating the domestic and global energy markets by providing leading-edge insight on issues critical to energy interdependency and developments in energy policy, regulation, and related litigation.

Connect to Recent Authors

  • Brian Heslin:  View Brian Heslin's Bio View Brian Heslin's LinkedIn profileFollow @BrianHeslin on Twitter
  • Mindy Vervais:  View Mindy Vervais’ Bio View Mindy Vervais’ LinkedIn profile

  • Subscribe to Blog Via Email

    Follow MVA

    Facebooktwitterlinkedinrss

    Blog Topics

    Archives


    Our Energy Practice

    Headquartered in the burgeoning energy hub of Charlotte, NC, Moore & Van Allen has an extensive energy practice that is national and international in scope. Our energy team is composed of highly-skilled attorneys from a cross-section of legal disciplines with a thorough understanding of the complex technologies, transactions, and regulations inherent to the energy industry and its various segments, including natural gas & LNG, electricity, oil, water & sewer, telecommunications, and alternative energy & green technology.

    We leverage our significant experience to guide our clients successfully through the intricacies of their businesses, from marketing, compliance counseling, and project development, to project finance, federal and state regulation, investigations and litigation. We proudly and successfully serve companies throughout the nation, including the largest natural gas and electric companies in the Carolinas. Read More About Our Practice and Meet the MVA Energy Team.

    Disclaimer

    No Attorney-Client Relationship Created by Use of this Website: Neither your receipt of information from this website, nor your use of this website to contact Moore & Van Allen or one of its attorneys creates an attorney-client relationship between you and Moore & Van Allen. As a matter of policy, Moore & Van Allen does not accept a new client without first investigating for possible conflicts of interests and obtaining a signed engagement letter. (Moore & Van Allen may, for example, already represent another party involved in your matter.) Accordingly, you should not use this website to provide confidential information about a legal matter of yours to Moore & Van Allen.


    No Legal Advice Intended: This website includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances. You should contact an attorney for advice on specific legal problems. (Read All)