CFTC, Dodd-Frank, Electricity, Energy Litigation, Energy Trading, FERC, Government Investigations, Natural Gas, U.S. Senate

Barriers to Cooperation between the CFTC and FERC Hinder Investigations into Energy Market Manipulation – A Legislative Fix May be on the Horizon

            The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) has initiated investigations into energy market manipulation in the last two years that have resulted in nearly $1 billion in penalties and profit disgorgements from companies and traders.  See our previous posts here, here, and  here.  Despite the significant enforcement efforts undertaken thus far, FERC Chairman Wellinghoff recently identified additional communication and jurisdictional barriers between FERC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) that are preventing FERC from more effectively fulfilling its charge to police the integrity of the energy markets.  FERC Chairman Wellinghoff explained in an August 2013 letter to Sen. Ron Wyden, chairman of the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, Sen. Lisa Murkowski, ranking member of the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, and Sen. Dianne Feinstein, chairman of the Appropriations Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development, the impact that disagreements between FERC and the CFTC and developing federal case law regarding FERC jurisdiction is having on the agency’s ability to exercise the authority that it believes it already has over the energy markets.  Chairman Wellinghoff’s letter was sent in response to the April 2013 letter from the Senators which urged the FERC and CFTC Chairmen to negotiate new Memorandums of Understanding (“MOUs”) that would integrate their market oversight efforts and increase communication and information sharing, as required by the Dodd-Frank Act.  Chairman Wellinghoff invited Congressional action to remove impediments to FERC exercising its authority, including the recent decision issued by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia in Hunter v. FERC, 711 F.3d 155 (D.C. Cir. 2013) which held that the CFTC has exclusive jurisdiction over futures.  On September 6, 2013, Senator Wyden and Senator Feinstein issued responding statements that forecast the possibility of legislative action to shore up FERC’s authority.

            In the April 2013 letter to Chairman Wellinghoff and CFTC Chairman Gensler, the Senators stressed their “strong concerns” that disputes between the agencies regarding the agencies’ jurisdiction “undermine the free flow of information and allow market manipulators to exploit gaps in regulatory oversight and ultimately drive up the price of energy for American consumers.”   Chairman Wellinghoff’s August 2013 letter responding to the Senators identified the following barriers that continue to prevent FERC and the CFTC from developing the new information sharing and jurisdictional MOUs required by Dodd-Frank:

  • FERC and the CFTC “disagree over whether the CFTC should provide FERC with certain data that we believe is critical to our surveillance program to detect and deter energy market manipulation,” including “the Large Trader Report, which would allow FERC staff to identify market participants with an incentive in the financial markets to manipulate the physical markets by trading at physical hubs and nodes.”  FERC believes that access to this report “would improve the efficiency and precision of FERC staffs surveillance screens.”
  • There is “disagreement over whether FERC has the authority to protect consumers from price impacts in the physical energy markets resulting from manipulation occurring in the financial markets,” although “FERC believes that in the Energy Policy Act of 2005, Congress authorized FERC to protect against manipulation that affects the wholesale natural gas and electric markets.”
  • The D.C. Circuit’s holding in Hunter that the CFTC has exclusive jurisdiction over futures, “depriv[es] FERC of authority to bring an action based on manipulation in the futures market even though the activity affected prices in the physical natural gas and electricity markets.”  Chairman Wellinghoff stated that he “support[s] a legislative fix to eliminate uncertainty on this matter and ensure that FERC has the full authority needed to police manipulation of wholesale physical natural gas and electric markets.”

            On September 6, 2013, Senators Wyden and Feinstein responded to Chairman Wellinghoff’s August 2013 letter with strongly worded statements, indicating that Congressional intervention can be expected to ensure that FERC and the CFTC meet their requirement to monitor trading in the natural gas and electricity markets and effectively protect consumers against market manipulation.  The Senators previously explained in the April 2013 letter that “[w]hile Federal statute divides the jurisdiction of FERC and CFTC between cash markets and futures markets, respectively, Federal law also recognizes that detecting many forms of manipulation in these integrated markets requires active oversight of both markets in an integrated fashion.”  Senator Wyden’s September 6th statement identifies the CFTC as the obstacle to such integrated market oversight and makes clear the Senator’s intent to address the issue at the Congressional level:

In the wake of the Enron scandal, Congress took steps in 2005 to strengthen the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s authority to police the energy markets. While FERC has already taken major enforcement actions against traders and companies that manipulated energy prices, it appears that their federal counterparts at the CFTC have been working to undermine FERC’s efforts. Chairman Wellinghoff has asked Congress to step in and I will be consulting with our colleagues on Capitol Hill about doing exactly that.

Senator Feinstein was equally as critical of the CFTC’s failure to cooperate in her September 6th statement:

In the Dodd-Frank Act, Congress directed CFTC and FERC to cooperate in order to protect American consumers from manipulation, so it is unconscionable the CFTC would be unwilling to share this essential information with FERC.

The entirety of Senator Wyden’s and Feinstein’s September 6th statements in response to Chairman Wellinghoff’s August 2013 letter can be read here.

            The news release regarding Senator Feinstein’s and Senator Wyden’s September 6th statements ended by noting that the record penalties recently assessed by FERC against JP Morgan ($410 million) and Barclays and four individual Barclays traders ($453 million) were achieved using legislative authority that was co-sponsored by Senators Wyden and Feinstein in 2005.   See our previous post.  With Chairman Wellinghoff’s engagement of Congress to fashion a new legislative fix to ensure that FERC is imbued with the authority necessary to maximize its enforcement powers, we certainly can expect to see sustained surveillance of the energy markets and enforcement efforts by the federal regulator.

Brian Heslin

About Brian Heslin

Brian Heslin represents energy companies in regulatory proceedings at the state and federal level. In addition, he provides advice on busines and strategic planning, upstream natural gas supply and capacity negotiation, compliance and other related services.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Welcome to the Energy Interdependency Blog!

The landscape of the energy industry is rapidly changing, with a focus on the development of clean, domestic energy sources and a secure, reliable energy infrastructure driving significant changes in the interdependency of energy industry segments and an increase in government regulation. Continued growth in the domestic production of oil and natural gas has positioned the U.S. to be an energy exporter in the global market and will have a marked impact on the course of the industry’s development.

The Moore & Van Allen Energy Interdependency Blog seeks to inform companies navigating the domestic and global energy markets by providing leading-edge insight on issues critical to energy interdependency and developments in energy policy, regulation, and related litigation.

Connect to Recent Authors

  • Brian Heslin:  View Brian Heslin's Bio View Brian Heslin's LinkedIn profileFollow @BrianHeslin on Twitter
  • Mindy Vervais:  View Mindy Vervais’ Bio View Mindy Vervais’ LinkedIn profile

  • Subscribe to Blog Via Email

    Follow MVA


    Blog Topics


    Our Energy Practice

    Headquartered in the burgeoning energy hub of Charlotte, NC, Moore & Van Allen has an extensive energy practice that is national and international in scope. Our energy team is composed of highly-skilled attorneys from a cross-section of legal disciplines with a thorough understanding of the complex technologies, transactions, and regulations inherent to the energy industry and its various segments, including natural gas & LNG, electricity, oil, water & sewer, telecommunications, and alternative energy & green technology.

    We leverage our significant experience to guide our clients successfully through the intricacies of their businesses, from marketing, compliance counseling, and project development, to project finance, federal and state regulation, investigations and litigation. We proudly and successfully serve companies throughout the nation, including the largest natural gas and electric companies in the Carolinas. Read More About Our Practice and Meet the MVA Energy Team.


    No Attorney-Client Relationship Created by Use of this Website: Neither your receipt of information from this website, nor your use of this website to contact Moore & Van Allen or one of its attorneys creates an attorney-client relationship between you and Moore & Van Allen. As a matter of policy, Moore & Van Allen does not accept a new client without first investigating for possible conflicts of interests and obtaining a signed engagement letter. (Moore & Van Allen may, for example, already represent another party involved in your matter.) Accordingly, you should not use this website to provide confidential information about a legal matter of yours to Moore & Van Allen.

    No Legal Advice Intended: This website includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances. You should contact an attorney for advice on specific legal problems. (Read All)